Content reviewed and verified by Graham Chee, with FCPA-led practice at Local Knowledge, Mascot NSW. Continuous CPA Australia member since 1986. Prior career at Goldman Sachs, BNP Investment Management and Merrill Lynch.. Last reviewed August 2026. Next review scheduled for November 2026.
Navigating the counter-intuitive decision to strategically divest a thriving business unit for sustained organisational growth.
Beyond Underperformance: A Strategic Imperative
Strategically divesting a high-performing business unit or asset is a counter-intuitive yet powerful decision for long-term value creation when its continued growth demands disproportionate capital or resource allocation, detracting from the organisation's core strategic trajectory. This analysis is written by Graham Chee, FCPA, CPA — Fellow of CPA Australia since November 2005, continuous CPA member since 1986, and principal of Local Knowledge. It explores this complex decision framework, focusing on how Australian business owners and directors can identify such scenarios and act decisively to safeguard their organisation's future understanding the true valuation of your business units. It's not about cutting losses, but about sharpening focus.
Frameworks for Principled Decision-Making
Core Strategy Alignment: A high-performing asset might no longer align with the evolving core business strategy, even if profitable. Maintaining it can dilute focus and strain resources, hindering the pursuit of primary objectives. As an FCPA, I emphasise that strategic alignment is paramount for sustainable growth, not just immediate profitability.
Resource Constraint Optimisation: Every organisation, particularly Small to Medium Enterprises (SMEs) in Australia, operates under finite capital, human resources, and management attention. Divesting a thriving asset can free up these critical resources for reinvestment into core areas with higher long-term strategic potential, as outlined in AASB accounting standards regarding asset revaluation and impairment.
Risk Mitigation and Diversification: Over-reliance on a single, albeit successful, business unit can introduce concentration risk. Strategic divestment can rebalance the portfolio, reducing exposure to specific market fluctuations or technological disruptions, a key consideration for corporate governance as per ASIC guidelines.
Market Dynamics and Future-Proofing: Rapid technological shifts or evolving consumer preferences can render even currently successful business models less viable in the long run. Proactive divestment allows companies to exit at peak valuation, capitalising on current performance before potential future declines, ensuring the business remains agile and competitive.
Valuation and Exit Strategy: Understanding the true market value of a high-performing asset is crucial. Engaging expert valuers and considering various exit strategies – trade sale, management buyout, or even an IPO for larger entities – ensures maximum return on divestment. The ATO's capital gains tax implications must also be meticulously planned for, particularly concerning assets held for more than 12 months.
Consider an Australian manufacturing firm that successfully diversified into a niche software development unit. This unit, while generating significant revenue and profits, now requires substantial ongoing investment in R&D and skilled personnel, potentially exceeding its parent company's core strategic focus on physical product innovation. The software unit's continued growth demands a disproportionate share of the parent company's capital budget, diverting funds from essential upgrades to manufacturing processes or expansion into new product lines.
From a principal-led perspective, the decision isn't whether the software unit is profitable – it clearly is. The question is whether its continued prosperity demands resources that would yield a higher long-term return when invested back into the core manufacturing business, or if the opportunity cost of holding it outweighs the benefits broader considerations like business succession planning. This requires a rigorous financial analysis, considering not just current P&L, but projected capital expenditure, talent acquisition challenges (especially under Fair Work regulations), and the impact on organisational culture and leadership focus. An FCPA sign-off on every file ensures this comprehensive view is taken, aligning financial decisions with strategic objectives.
Navigating the Decision with Precision
Conduct a comprehensive review of all business units against the organisation's long-term strategic objectives and core competencies. Ask: Does this asset contribute to our primary mission, or is it a successful but tangential venture? This review should be led by principals with a deep understanding of market dynamics and internal capabilities.
Quantify the capital, human, and managerial resources currently allocated to the high-performing asset. Project future resource demands. Then, critically assess the alternative uses for these resources within your core business, estimating the potential long-term value creation if redirected. This requires detailed financial modelling and a robust understanding of your core business's growth levers.
Engage independent valuers to determine the fair market value of the asset. Concurrently, assess the current market appetite for such an asset. A thriving market can command a premium, making divestment highly attractive. Consider potential buyers, their strategic rationale, and how a sale might be structured to maximise shareholder value while minimising tax implications, guided by current ATO tax rulings.
Develop a meticulous execution plan for the divestment, including legal, financial, and communication strategies. Crucially, have a clear, pre-defined plan for reinvesting the proceeds into your core business or other strategic growth initiatives. This ensures the divestment truly contributes to long-term value, rather than simply creating a cash surplus.
Addressing Your Strategic Concerns
Objectivity comes from a rigorous resource allocation audit and scenario planning. Map out the capital expenditure, talent, and management time currently consumed by the asset versus its strategic alignment. Compare its projected return on investment (ROI) against the ROI if those resources were deployed in your core operations. This principal-led practice since 2003 helps provide clarity. expert accounting and business advisory services
Beyond the sale price, consider capital gains tax (CGT) implications as per ATO guidelines, particularly the small business CGT concessions if applicable (e.g., turnover of less than $2 million or net asset value under $6 million). Also, assess the impact on your balance sheet, cash flow, and future earnings per share. An FCPA will guide you through these complexities.
Not if communicated strategically and transparently. Frame it as a proactive move to sharpen focus and strengthen the core business for future growth. Emphasise the long-term benefits and how the decision aligns with a clear vision. For employees of the divested unit, Fair Work Australia guidelines on employee entitlements and transfers must be strictly adhered to.
Timelines vary significantly based on the asset's complexity, market conditions, and regulatory requirements. A well-planned divestment process, from initial assessment to final sale, can range from 6 to 18 months. Rushing the process often leads to suboptimal outcomes. Thorough due diligence, both internal and external, is critical.
Strategic Foresight for Lasting Value
The decision to divest a high-performing asset is never easy, requiring courage, foresight, and a deep understanding of your organisation's true north. It’s a testament to principal-led thought leadership, prioritising long-term value over short-term gratification. By strategically de-escalating, Australian business owners and directors can unlock new growth avenues, strengthen their core, and build more resilient, focused enterprises. Don't let success in one area inadvertently stifle potential in another. This is where objective, expert guidance becomes indispensable. As Graham Chee, FCPA, I believe in empowering business owners with the frameworks and judgement needed to make these critical decisions with confidence and clarity.

Principal and Founder, Local Knowledge
Graham Chee is the principal and founder of Local Knowledge, an FCPA-led Australian practice that brings institutional-grade compliance, investment-structure and intellectual-property experience directly to owner-managed businesses. Graham is a Fellow of CPA Australia (FCPA since November 2005, continuous CPA member since 1986) and holds the OCEG Governance, Risk & Compliance Professional (GRCP) and Governance, Risk & Compliance Auditor (GRCA) designations. His prior career includes senior roles at Goldman Sachs, BNP Investment Management and Merrill Lynch. Graham was previously portfolio manager of the Asian Masters Fund (IPO December 2007 – 31 December 2009), which returned +29% in AUD terms versus the MSCI Asia Pacific (ex Japan) benchmark. He signs off on 100% of client files personally.
Areas of Expertise:
This article is especially relevant to these industries. See how we tailor our services for each.
Every business situation is unique. Our team can provide tailored guidance for your specific needs, grounded in the CPA Code of Ethics and practical experience.
Graham Chee FCPA, CPA, GRCP, GRCA · Principal, Local Knowledge · Mascot NSW · CPA-signed files